Apple iPhone 17The plan was released later this year, but according to Trump’s public collection of apples25%Customs policy, apples will be forced to bear extra costs, and theniPhone 17Probably up the price. In this case, the Attorney General of California, Rob Bunta,Rob Bonta.) indicates that consideration is being given to initiating proceedings against Trump alleging that it “is issuing a threat order against a single enterprise”.
5Month21Trump announced an increase in EU imports.50%Tariffs (the policy was postponed toSeven.Month9) and specifically named apples. The threat of apple production outside the United States.iPhoneI’ll add to it.25%and import duties.
Bloomberg journalist.Mark Gurman.It was previously noted that high costsiPhoneThere is no real possibility that the production line could be transformed. But Caroline Levitte, White House Press Secretary.Karoline Leavitt.) and emphasise, Trump vs.iPhoneProduction is “highly confident” because the United States has sufficient resources to achieve this goal.
Rob.Bounta stated that he was proud of the business coming from California, especially the apples, claiming to ensure that their rights were not violated. According to The Politicians,PoliticoAccording to reports, Rob Bonta is considering the prosecution of Trump, claiming that Trump’s decision on apples is very casual.
Rob.“Trump’s statement against apples is clearly very disappointing. Like he woke up in the morning and said, “I think apples should make more cell phones, maybe I should tell them.CEO“I’m just kidding.” We will review whether their statements constitute illegal administrative interference against a single enterprise.”
“We are proud of companies like California, which produce apples, which make California the fourth largest economy in the world. It is our duty to guarantee the inviolability of their rights, particularly the ultra vires interference of the President. This is not only a matter of corporate interests, but also of corporate interests.InvolvingHundreds of thousands of jobs and technological innovation.It’s not like it’s the same thing.It was emphasized in the Rob Bonta statement.
Trump’s tariff plan is his.Part of the US Priority policy is aimed at stimulating domestic manufacturing by imposing tariffs on imported goods. However, critics argue that this could trigger inflation, retaliatory tariffs and negative effects on United States consumers. As the centrepiece of the United States science and technology industry, California may take a strong stand because of the potential harm of tariffs to the local economy and employment.
According to analysts, apples are fully transferring the production line to the United States.5Over the years, it involves equipment, worker training and logistics reconstruction at a cost of billions of dollars. If customs duties are imposed,iPhonePrices may rise.10-20 per centI don’t know.And…Transfer costs to consumers;Or a portion of the cost is absorbed by apples, which compresses the profit margin.
The Department of Justice of California indicated that a decision on whether to initiate proceedings would be made public upon completion of the legal assessment. Apple refused to comment on it, but only reiterated it.“Sustained assessment of global supply chain resilience”.
